Publications

Patent Reform: Changes to Reissues and the New Supplemental Examination Procedure

  • Patent Reform: Changes to Reissues and the New Supplemental Examination Procedure

Volume 9, Issue 4

  • From Your Office to the Patent Office: Tips on Gathering and Identifying Patentable Employee Inventions
  • Tips on Controlling Intellectual Property Protection Costs: What Business Owners Need to Know
  • Patentability of Process Claims and Business Method Inventions with No “Machine or Transformation”

Patent Reform: Transitional Review of Business Method Patents Under AIA

  • Patent Reform: Transitional Review of Business Method Patents Under AIA

Patent Reform: Advice of Counsel

  • Patent Reform: New Section 298 Will Preclude Patentees from Proving Willfulness or Inducement Through an Alleged Infringer's Failure to Obtain or Provide Evidence of an Opinion of Counsel

Patent Reform: Derivation Proceedings

The .XXX Top Level Domain: What Do I Need to Know Now?

“First-Inventor-to-File” to Replace the Current “First-to-Invent” System

  • “First-Inventor-to-File” to Replace the Current “First-to-Invent” System

Patent Reform: What Has Already Changed?

Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Ratchets Up Fees 10 Days After Enactment

  • Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Ratchets Up Fees 10 Days After Enactment

Volume 9, Issue 3

Volume 9, Issue 2

  • Stanford v. Roche: Part II: The Supreme Court Has Spoken
  • Post-Issuance Options: The Benefits and Risks of Reexamination and Reissue
  • Obviousness of Pharmaceuticals - Patentability Over Known, Structurally Similar Compounds
  • Stanford v. Roche, the Bayh-Dole Act, and the Possibility of Unintended Consequences

Volume 9, Issue 1

  • While Not Right for Every Invention, Trade Secret Protection Has Its Appeal
  • Considerations for Software Patent Claims in the United States, Europe, and Canada
  • Where (and Even When) Does KSR Belong in Obviousness Arguments?
  • Patent Data, Prior Art, and Operational Transparency at the USPTO
    • by Dennis D. Crouch

Volume 8, Issue 4

Volume 8, Issue 3

  • Free, But Not Without Risk: Open Source Licensing in the Wake of Jacobsen v. Katzer
  • A Survey of the Peer to Patent Pilot Project
    • by Eric Hamp
  • The Federal Circuit Decides to Reconsider Inequitable Conduct
  • Citation by IDS: So What if I Didn't?

snippets ALERT: Bilski Viewpoints

  • Questions Surrounding a Shift to an "Abstract Idea" Test
  • Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. Kappos
  • With Bilski Having Come and Gone, It's Time to Get Back to Work
  • Avoiding Abstract Claims by Broadly Defining the Problem
    • by Dennis D. Crouch
  • A Critique of Bilski's Textual Analysis
  • Bilski v. Kappos: Effects on Biotechnology Patents

Volume 8, Issue 2

Volume 8, Issue 1

  • Enablement: The Federal Circuit Raises the Bar (Again)
  • Rule Changes to European Patent Practice
  • Trade Secret Basics: What Every Business Owner Needs to Know

Volume 7, Issue 4

  • Maintaining Confidentiality in Technology Transactions: New Problems with an Old Concept
  • Patent Valuation: How to Reduce Vulnerability and Increase Value
  • Revisiting the Patent Eligibility of Genes

Volume 7, Issue 3

  • Shire LLC v. Sandoz Inc.: Issue Preclusion and Markman Decisions
  • Copyright Basics: What Every Business Owner Should Know
  • It Only Took a Hundred Years: The Federal Circuit Finally Settles the Doctrine of Infringement of Product-By-Process Claims
    • by Eric Hamp

Volume 7, Issue 2

  • Gene Patenting after In re Kubin: The Sky is Not Falling
  • The ABC's of ® and ©: Taking Note of Notice
  • The USPTO's New Written Description Training Materials: Impact on Biotech

snippets ALERT: Tafas v. Doll

  • Tafas v. Doll

Volume 7, Issue 1

  • News from the USPTO
  • Navigating Inventorship in the Chemical Industry
  • Of Machines and Metamorphoses - Process and Software Claims After In re Bilski

Volume 6, Issue 3

Volume 6, Issue 2

  • Practical Patent Tips: How to Conduct an Effective Inventor Interview
  • Where Does the USPTO Go after Tafas/GSK v. Dudas?
  • Computer-Implemented Claims Limitations and 35 USC SS 112, paragraph 6

Volume 6, Issue 1

  • Seagate: Reports of the Death of Opinions of Counsel Have Been Greatly Exaggerated
  • It's Not Easy Selling Green
  • Follow-on Biologic Drugs and Patent Law: A Potential Disconnect?
  • Patent Litigation Under a Future Biosimilars Act

Volume 5, Issue 2

  • Duty of Disclosure: Citation of Non-Patent References
  • E-Discovery FAQ: Part 2: Litigating Today Under the New Electronic Discovery Amendments
  • Trademark Infringement by the Sale and Use of Search Engine Keywords

Volume 5, Issue 1

Snippets Alert: KSR v. Teleflex

ESI: Electronically Stored Information PowerPoint

  • ESI: Electronically Stored Information PowerPoint

Volume 4, Issue 1

  • Federal Circuit Further Limits Doctrine of Equivalents Under "Specific Exclusion" Principle
  • mbhb News: Welcome New Associates
  • Avoiding Patent Owner Disputes
    • by Raef M. Shaltout
  • USPTO Patent Prosecution Practice Rule Changes

Volume 3, Issue 2

  • Due Diligence in Patent Licensing Transactions
  • Patent Reform Act of 2005: Recent Developments
  • Find Out What You Have Been Missing with a Trademark Audit
  • Recent Trends in E-Discovery, Part II: Cost Shifting, Burden Shifting, and Immortal Documents

Volume 3, Issue 1

  • Recent Trends in E-Discovery, Part I: New Local Rules and Recent Judicial Opinions
  • The Continued Confusion Over Written Description
  • Legislative Update: Joint Research Agreements May Protect Patent Rights
  • The Primary Source for Claim Construction: Dictionary or Specification?

Volume 2, Issue 3

  • On Your Mark! . . . Get Set! . . .Know!: Marking Fundamentals
  • The Intersection of Trade Secrets and Patent Law: The Prior User Rights Statute, 35 U.S.C. § 273, Part 2
  • Patent Validity Assessments: Your Guide to Avoiding the On-Sale Bar, Part 2
  • Drafting the Technology Game Plan Part 5: Domain Name Protection

Volume 2, Issue 2

  • The Intersection of Trade Secrets and Patent Law: The Prior User Rights Statute, 35 U.S.C. § 273, Part I
  • Festo Extended: Honeywell v. Hamilton Sundstrand
  • Caveat Sender, Part 2: Unintentional Disclosure In Electronic Documents
    • by Brian R. Harris
  • Electronic Laboratory Notebooks: Improved Data Storage or Increased Burden?

Volume 2, Issue 1

  • Claim Construction 101: Unlocking the Meaning of Preambles
  • Patent Validity Assessments: Your Guide to Avoiding the On-Sale Bar
  • Drafting the Technology Game Plan, Part 4: Effective Trademark Searching
  • The New Statutory Interference Bar: Should You Monitor Competitors' Published Patents?
  • Caveat Sender: What Else Is Attached to Your E-Mail?
    • by Brian R. Harris

Volume 1, Issue 2

  • Drafting the Technology Game Plan, Part 3: Proper Inventorship Determinations
  • National Prejudice: Alive and Well in the WIPO World
  • Tools of the Trade: Scope of the Section 271(e)(1) Research Exemption
  • Festo and the Federal Circuit: The Exception to the Exception to the Exception . . .
  • Doha Revisited: WTO Endorses Parallel Compulsory Licensing

Volume 1, Issue 1

  • From Doha to Baghdad via DC: U.S. Pharmaceutical Policy in a Troubled World
  • "Reach Through" the Searle Decision . . .
  • . . . And Show Me the Chemistry
  • Festo: The Federal Circuit Hears Oral Argument
  • Drafting the Technology Game-Plan, Part 1: Patent Searches
  • Drafting the Technology Game-Plan, Part 2: Opinions of Counsel
Close
Generate a PDF of your page(s)
Clear
Close
Remove
Page has been queued
An error has occurred
Add
Added to queue
View
Confirm Delete All Message
No Items in Packet Message
To add a page, select Add. To view the package, select View.
false
http://www.mbhb.com/pubs/xpqPublicationResults.aspx?xpST=Snippets&pdf=yes
a[href='javascript:packetBuilderSingleClick(document.title);']