Abstract Ideas after Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l: The USPTO Issues Interim Guidance and Examples (Live MBHB Webinar)

On January 27, 2015, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office provided long-awaited examples of patent-eligible and patent-ineligible inventions that incorporate abstract ideas. These examples are a follow-up to the Office’s 2014 Interim Eligibility Guidance that was published the month before. Nonetheless, navigating the waters of patentable subject matter is still a potentially dangerous trek. This presentation will provide an integrated view of the guidelines and the examples, focusing on which post-Alice questions are answered, and which are not. Topics will include:



  • Differences between the claim language of the examples and that of the guidance.
  • A roadmap for drafting patent-eligible claims based on the Office’s view of Section 101.
  • The different footings of business method and software claims.
  • A discussion of whether claims that are found patent-eligible by the Office could be found ineligible by the courts.

 


Presenter: MBHB attorney Michael S. Borella, Ph.D.


Access an archived audio version of this webinar here. NOTE: MCLE credit is not available for this archived recording.  

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP is committed to educating clients and friends of the firm with respect to significant developments and trends in the areas of intellectual property law.


 

Search by Type
Menu
Menu